色谱 ›› 2021, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (2): 105-111.DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1123.2020.07019

• 微型述评 • 上一篇    下一篇

核糖核酸-蛋白质复合物规模化富集与鉴定技术的研究进展

樊智雅, 秦伟捷*()   

  1. 军事科学院军事医学研究院生命组学研究所,北京蛋白质组研究中心,国家蛋白质科学中心(北京),蛋白质组学国家重点实验室, 北京 102206
  • 收稿日期:2020-07-19 出版日期:2021-02-08 发布日期:2021-01-14
  • 通讯作者: 秦伟捷
  • 作者简介:

    秦伟捷: 军事医学研究院,生命组学研究所,国家蛋白质科学中心(北京),研究员,博士生导师。研究方向为基于富集新材料/新试剂和质谱新方法的低丰度/修饰蛋白质组分析技术,以及蛋白质组技术在疾病标志物筛选中的应用研究。近年来发展了一系列特色性的低丰度/修饰蛋白质、外泌体富集材料、亲和抗体和化学标记富集方法,显著提高了鉴定灵敏度和规模。特别是围绕着作为重要诊断标志物和药物靶点的糖基化蛋白质,建立了多种高效富集、鉴定和数据解析新方法,为糖蛋白质组研究提供了系统性工具。先后主持国家重大科学研究计划课题、国家重大科学仪器设备开发专项课题、国家重点研发专项(精准医学)课题以及国家自然科学基金面上项目等。在Mol Cell, Chem Sci, Anal Chem, Nucleic Acids Res等高水平杂志发表论文50余篇。中国质谱学会理事,中国生物化学与分子生物学会蛋白质组学专业委员会委员、糖复合物专业委员会委员。* Tel:(010)61777111,E-mail: aunp_dna@126.com.
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划(2016YFA0501403);国家自然科学基金(21675172)

Advances in technologies for large-scale enrichment and identification of ribonucleic acid-protein complexes

FAN Zhiya, QIN Weijie*()   

  1. Beijing Institute of Lifeomics, Beijing Proteome Research Center, National Center for Protein Sciences(Beijing), State Key Laboratory of Proteomics, Beijing 102206, China
  • Received:2020-07-19 Online:2021-02-08 Published:2021-01-14
  • Contact: QIN Weijie
  • Supported by:
    National Key Research and Development Program of China(2016YFA0501403);National Natural Science Foundation of China(21675172)

摘要:

核糖核酸(RNA)在细胞中并非单独存在,从它们产生到被降解的过程中与大量蛋白质发生相互作用,RNA结合蛋白(RNA-binding proteins, RBPs)能与RNA结合形成RNA-蛋白质复合物(RP复合物),并以这种复合物的形式发挥生理功能。RNAs或RBPs任一组分的异常与缺失都会影响RP复合物的正常生理功能,从而导致疾病的发生,如代谢异常、肌肉萎缩症、自身免疫性疾病和癌症。因此,定性定量分析RBPs及其在正常细胞和肿瘤细胞中与RNAs靶标之间的复杂相互作用网络有助于挖掘RP复合物在肿瘤发生发展中的作用,开发肿瘤生物标志物和新的治疗方式。要深入研究和理解RNAs与RBPs的相互作用网络,须依赖组学技术对RP复合物进行大规模鉴定。而作为在组学层面系统性解析RP复合物组成、含量和功能的第一步,大规模富集RP复合物极具挑战性。为了解决这一难题,研究者们发展了各种富集鉴定策略。该文针对RP复合物富集策略的最新进展进行了综述,包括紫外光交联和免疫沉淀(crosslinking and immunoprecipitation, CLIP)及其衍生技术、基于“点击化学”的富集策略和基于相分离的富集策略,比较分析了它们的技术原理、优缺点,以方便研究者们选择合适的策略来解决感兴趣的生物学问题。该文最后总结了当前的RP复合物富集方法仍然存在富集效率低和操作繁琐等亟需解决的技术挑战,为富集策略的发展提供了研究方向。

关键词: 核糖核酸结合蛋白, 紫外光交联和免疫沉淀, 规模化富集, 生物正交反应, 相分离

Abstract:

Ribonucleic acid (RNA) rarely exists alone in the cell. RNAs interact with a variety of proteins and form RNA-protein complexes (RP-complexes) in every step of their life cycle, from transcription to degradation. These RP-complexes play key roles in regulating a variety of physiological processes. Defects in the composition and function of RP-complexes have been associated with many diseases, including metabolic disorders, muscular atrophy, autoimmune diseases, and cancer. It is hence evident that deciphering the highly complex interaction network of RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) and their RNA targets will provide a better understanding of disease development and lead to the discovery of new targets for cancer therapy. Large-scale identification of RP-complexes at the omics level is a prerequisite for obtaining insights into the complex RNA-protein interaction network. As the first step in omics-wide decoding of RP-complexes, enrichment and purification of RP-complexes is a highly challenging task. Recently, intensive efforts have been undertaken to better enrich and identify RP-complexes. Generally, the enrichment strategies can be classified into two major categories: in vitro and in vivo. Although it has been successfully applied in many studies, the in vitro transcribed bait RNA lacks modifications or structural similarity compared with its natural counterpart. Further, since the proteins relocate and remodel after cell lysis, the use of cell lysates as a protein source may result in capturing false interacting proteins that bind non-physiologically with the bait RNA. Finally, weak interactions between the non-covalently bound proteins and RNA require mild washing to remove non-specific binding, which needs careful optimization. However, substantial sample loss is inevitable. To overcome the disadvantages of in vitro approaches, in vivo cross-linking strategies that “freeze” natural RNA-protein complexes in intact cells via covalent cross-linking have become increasingly popular. The in vivo methods allow RNA to interact with proteins in the intracellular environment. Therefore, the RP-complexes formed under physiological conditions are more biologically relevant than those obtained by in vitro methods. We herein summarize recent in vivo methodological advances in the large-scale enrichment and identification of RP-complexes, including cross-linking and immunoprecipitation (CLIP) and related methods, click chemistry-assisted methods, and organic phase separations. CLIP involves irradiating living cells with 254-nm ultraviolet (UV) light to establish covalent bonds between RNA and proteins. This enables CLIP to purify RNAs bound to a specific RBP under conditions that are stringent enough to prevent co-purification of nonspecifically bound proteins or free RNAs. Since the original study, multiple variant protocols have been derived to increase both efficiency and convenience. Photoactivatable ribonucleoside-enhanced-CLIP (PAR-CLIP) introduces a variation in the crosslinking strategy. Cells were preincubated with photoactivatable ribonucleosides 4-thiouridine (4SU) or 6-thioguanosine (6SG), which enables protein-RNA crosslinking with 365-nm UV-A irradiation. It increases the efficiency of cross-linking between RNA and RBPs and is particularly valuable for studying the interactions between RBPs and nascent RNA. Using a click chemistry-assisted strategy, an alkyne modified uridine analog, 5-ethynyluridine (EU), was incorporated into nascent RNAs via metabolic incorporation in living cells. Combined with UV irradiation-based cross-linking, the alkyne-functionalized RNA and the bound proteins were purified in a poly A-independent fashion by the highly selective bioorthogonal copper (I)-catalyzed azide-alkyne cycloaddition using azide-modified beads. Thus, full lists of both coding and non-coding RNAs with their interacting proteins can be purified, which is a major methodological advance. Organic phase separation methods exploiting the physicochemical difference between cross-linked RP-complexes and free RNA and proteins do not require metabolic-based alkyne labeling or polyA-based RNA capture. Each method has unique strengths and drawbacks, which makes it important to select optimal approaches for the biological question being addressed. We hope that this review points out the current limitations and provides future directions to facilitate further development of methods for large-scale investigation of RP-complexes.

Key words: RNA-binding proteins, ultraviolet crosslinking and immunoprecipitation, large-scale enrichment, biorthogonal reaction, phase separation

中图分类号: