基于碳基磁性材料的磁固相萃取技术在食品分析应用中的研究进展

doi:10.3724/SP.J.1123.2020.05038

色谱 ›› 2021, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (4): 368-375.DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1123.2020.05038

基于碳基磁性材料的磁固相萃取技术在食品分析应用中的研究进展

廖颖敏¹^,^*(), 黄晓佳²^,^*(), 王卓卓², 甘蕊¹

1.厦门大学嘉庚学院, 河口生态安全与环境健康福建省高校重点实验室, 福建漳州 363105
2.厦门大学环境与生态学院, 福建厦门 361005

收稿日期:2020-05-30 出版日期:2021-04-08 发布日期:2021-03-08
通讯作者: 廖颖敏,黄晓佳
作者简介:Tel:(0592)2189278,E-mail: hxj@xmu.edu.cn(黄晓佳).
*Tel:(0596)6288702,E-mail: ymliao@xujc.com(廖颖敏);
基金资助:
福建省高校青年自然基金重点项目(JZ160494);厦门大学嘉庚学院大学生创新创业训练计划项目.(202013469076)

Research progress in the application of magnetic solid phase extraction based on carbon based magnetic materials in food analysis

LIAO Yingmin¹^,^*(), HUANG Xiaojia²^,^*(), WANG Zhuozhuo², GAN Rui¹

1. Estuarine Ecological Security and Environmental Health Key Laboratory of Provincial University,Tan Kah Kee College, Xiamen University, Zhangzhou 363105, China
2. College of Environment and Ecology, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, China

Received:2020-05-30 Online:2021-04-08 Published:2021-03-08
Contact: LIAO Yingmin,HUANG Xiaojia
Supported by:
Fujian Province University Youth Natural Fund Key Project(JZ160494);Training Project of Innovation and Entrepreneurship for College Students of Tan Kah Kee College of Xiamen University(202013469076)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

食品中残留的痕量有毒物质严重威胁人体健康,对其进行分析十分必要。然而,食品中有毒物质种类多、量少、基质复杂,需选择适当的样品预处理技术进行提取和净化。磁固相萃取(MSPE)因具有操作简单、省时快速、无需离心过滤、环境友好等优点,被认为是一种高效的样品预处理技术并应用于食品分析中。MSPE中使用的磁性吸附剂的吸附容量和选择性是影响MSPE萃取效率和选择性高低的关键,对所建立分析方法的准确度起着关键作用。碳基磁性材料是具有价格低廉、来源丰富、比表面积大、化学稳定性好、吸附容量高、绿色环保等优点的一类新型功能性磁性材料,可以富集不同性质的有机、无机分析物,在环境分析、生物检测、污染治理等多个领域取得了较大进展。近年来,基于碳基磁性材料的MSPE技术在食品分析预处理领域逐渐得到应用,但尚处于起步阶段,存在巨大的应用潜力。该文以碳基类别(碳纳米管、石墨烯、金属有机骨架衍生碳、活性炭等)为主线,综述了采用MSPE技术,以碳基磁性材料为吸附剂,对食品样品中酯类、真菌毒素、多环芳烃、抗生素、生物碱、酚类、维生素、抗菌药等物质进行萃取,进而采用液相色谱法等进行分析的应用实例,同时阐述了该技术存在的问题,并对其发展方向做出了展望。该综述将为基于碳基磁性材料的MSPE技术在食品分析中的广泛应用提供理论依据和技术支撑。

关键词: 磁固相萃取, 碳基磁性材料, 吸附剂, 食品分析, 综述

Abstract: Trace toxic substances in food pose a serious threat to human health, and need to be detected and analyzed to ensure food safety. However, there are many kinds of toxic substances in food, with small amounts and complex matrices, making it necessary to select an appropriate sample pretreatment technology for extraction and purification. There are some disadvantages to sample pretreatment methods such as solid phase extraction and liquid-liquid extraction, in terms of poor selectivity, significant influence of matrix interference, large sample requirement, long extraction time, use of a large amount of harmful organic solvents, and cumbersome and time-consuming operation. Magnetic solid phase extraction (MSPE) combines the advantages of magnetic separation and traditional SPE technology, avoids time-consuming column loading, and can extract the target analyte efficiently. Because of its advantages, in that it has simple operation, is time-saving and fast, requires no centrifugal filtration, and is environmentally friendly, it is considered an efficient sample pretreatment technology and applied in food analysis. The adsorption capacity and selectivity of the magnetic adsorbent used in MSPE are the key factors affecting the extraction efficiency and selectivity of MSPE, and play a key role in the accuracy of the established method. Carbon-based magnetic materials are a type of new functional magnetic materials prepared by the co-precipitation of carbon-based materials (carbon nanotubes, graphene, metal-organic framework-derived carbon, or activated carbon) and magnetic materials. In order to endow carbon-based magnetic materials with the advantages of both, carbon materials and magnetic materials, while also reflecting the advantages of high specific surface area, good stability, low cost, environmental friendliness, excellent physical and chemical properties, high porosity, and high adsorption capacity, proper functional modification is needed. Carbon-based magnetic materials modified by functionalization can efficiently enrich organic and inorganic analytes with different properties, and have seen significant progress in environmental analysis, biological detection, pollution control, and other fields. In recent years, MSPE technology based on carbon-based magnetic materials has been gradually applied in food analysis and pretreatment, but its use is still in infancy and holds immense application potential. Reference to more than 50 papers published in SCI and Chinese core journals over the past four years reveals that carbon-based materials include carbon nanotubes modified by functional groups, reagents, or materials; graphene, graphene oxide, and reduced graphene oxide; carbon derived from a gold organic framework; activated carbon biochar; and nanodiamond. The harmful substances in food samples include esters, mycotoxins, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, antibiotics, alkaloids, phenols, vitamins, and antibiotics. Based on the classification of carbon-based materials, this review reveals that carbon-based magnetic materials have good preconcentration ability for harmful substances in food samples. MSPE can be combined with GC-MS, liquid chromatography-high resolution mass spectrometry (LC-HRMS), ultra-fast liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (UFLC-MS/MS), ultra high performance liquid chromatography-Q-Exactive high resolution mass spectrometry (UHPLC-Q-Exactive HRMS), high performance liquid chromatography-diode array detection (HPLC-DAD), gas chromatography micro-electron capture detection (GC-μECD), high performance liquid chromatography fluorescence with post-column photochemical derivatization (HPLC-PCD-FLD), and HPLC-UV to analyze food samples. These combined technologies have high accuracy and recovery. However, the synthesis methods of carbon-based magnetic materials such as carbon nanotubes and graphene, incur high energy consumption and high cost, and involve complex processes, which limit their application. Therefore, a carbon-based magnetic adsorbent with low cost, high selectivity, and high extraction efficiency was developed by further exploring functional modification with biochar as a carbon base. This is a very promising direction to develop MSPE technology utilizing biochar-based magnetic materials for food sample pretreatment. This review provides a theoretical basis and technical support for the wide application of carbon-based magnetic materials in MSPE technology for food analysis.

Key words: magnetic solid phase extraction (MSPE), carbon based magnetic material, adsorbent, food analysis, review

中图分类号:

O658

廖颖敏, 黄晓佳, 王卓卓, 甘蕊. 基于碳基磁性材料的磁固相萃取技术在食品分析应用中的研究进展[J]. 色谱, 2021, 39(4): 368-375.

LIAO Yingmin, HUANG Xiaojia, WANG Zhuozhuo, GAN Rui. Research progress in the application of magnetic solid phase extraction based on carbon based magnetic materials in food analysis[J]. Chinese Journal of Chromatography, 2021, 39(4): 368-375.

图/表 2

参考文献

[1]	Wu F Q, Yue Z F, Zhang Y, et al. Chinese Journal of Chromatography, 2020,38(7):759
[1]	吴凤琪, 岳振峰, 张毅, 等. 色谱, 2020,38(7):759
[2]	Liu Y, Fang X A, Chen G S, et al. TrAC-Trends Anal Chem, 2019,113:224
[3]	Wang W W, Liu S Q, Xue Y, et al. Chinese Journal of Chromatography, 2017,35(1):99
[3]	王薇薇, 刘素琴, 薛芸, 等. 色谱, 2017,35(1):99
[4]	Wang C, Wang Z. Chinese Journal of Chromatography, 2015,33(12):1223
[4]	王春, 王志. 色谱, 2015,33(12):1223
[5]	Nian Q X, Liu Y M, Sun B, et al. Chinese Journal of Chromatography, 2019,37(3):252
[5]	念琪循, 刘园满, 孙冰, 等. 色谱, 2019,37(3):252
[6]	Xiao Z W, He M, Chen B B, et al. Chinese Journal of Chromatography, 2020,38(1):127
[6]	肖作为, 何蔓, 陈贝贝, 等. 色谱, 2020,38(1):127
[7]	Liu C, Liao Y M, Huang X J, et al. Talanta, 2019,194:771
[8]	Speltini A, Sturini M, Maraschi F, et al. Trends Environ Anal Chem, 2016,10:11
[9]	Li W K, Shi Y P. TrAC-Trends Anal Chem, 2019,118:652
[10]	Yao W X, Zhuang J B, Zhang S L, et al. Chinese Journal of Chromatography, 2015,33(4):342
[10]	姚伟宣, 庄剑波, 张素玲, 等. 色谱, 2015,33(4):342
[11]	Kiani A, Ahmadloo M, Shariatifar N, et al. Environ Sci Pollut Res, 2018,25:12728
[12]	Shariatifar N, Dadgar M, Fakhri Y, et al. J Food Compos Anal, 2020,85:103331
[13]	Fu L, Zhou H, Miao E, et al. Food Chem, 2019,289:701
[14]	Jiang H L, Lin Y L, Li N, et al. Food Chem, 2018,269:413
[15]	Cheng H L, Wang F L, Zhao Y G, et al. Anal Methods, 2018,10:1151
[16]	Zhao Y, Yuan Y C, Bai X L, et al. Food Chem, 2020,305, 125429
[17]	Li W K, Zhang H X, Shi Y P. Anal Chim Acta, 2018,1011:40
[18]	Ulusoy H I, Gulle S, Yilmaz E, et al. Anal Methods, 2019,11(40):5108
[19]	Chen H, Huang C, Zhang W, et al. J Chromatogr A, 2019,1608:460404
[20]	Wang Q, Lian J X, Hua Z D, et al. Anal Methods, 2018,10:5516
[21]	Chen Y L, Cao S R, Zhang L, et al. Food Anal Methods, 2017,10:587
[22]	Nodeh H R, Sereshti H, Caikani H, et al. J Chromatogr A, 2017,1059:26
[23]	Wang Q, Zhang L. J Chromatogr A, 2018,1568:1
[24]	Rahimi A, Zanjanchi M A, Bakhtiari S, et al. Food Chem, 2018,262:206
[25]	Mahpishanian S, Sereshti H. J Chromatogr A, 2016,1443:43
[26]	Liu X L, Zhou X, Wang C, et al. Food Addit Contam A, 2015,32(1):40
[27]	Wang Y T, Liu L P, Xiao C X, et al. Food Anal Methods, 2016,9:2521
[28]	Liang L, Wang X H, Sun Y, et al. Talanta, 2018,179:512
[29]	Abdelghani J I, Freihat R S. Chem Eng J, 2020,8:103527
[30]	Abdolmohammad-Zadeh H, Zamani A, Shamsi Z A. Environ Sci Pollut R, 2020,27:9826
[31]	Yu L, Ma F, Zhang L X, et al. Toxins, 2019,11(11):621
[32]	Li W Q, Zhang J, Zhu W L, et al. Talanta, 2020,208:120440
[33]	Li D D, He M, Chen B B, et al. J Chromatogr A, 2019,1583:19
[34]	Wang C, Liu L, Zhang Z H, et al. Food Anal Methods, 2016,9:80
[35]	Ren K Y, Zhang W L, Cao S R, et al. Nanomaterials, 2018,8(5):302
[36]	Liu X Y, Tong Y, Zhang L. Food Chem, 2020,303:125369
[37]	Moazzen M, Mahvi A H, Shariatifar N, et al. Toxin Rev, 2018,37(4):319
[38]	Moazzen M, Khaneghah A M, Shariatifar N, et al. Arab J Chem, 2019,12:476
[39]	Razmkhah K, Sereshti H, Soltani S, et al. Food Anal Method, 2018,11:3179
[40]	Li N, Jiang H L, Wang X, et al. TrAC-Trends Anal Chem, 2018,102:60
[41]	Nodeh H R, Ibrahim W A W, Sanagi M M. Chemosphere, 2017,166:21
[42]	Choi S H, Lee J K, Kang Y C. Nano Res, 2015,8(5):1584
[43]	Guo J H, Tong S L. Chinese Journal of Chromatography, 2020,38(5):522
[43]	郭菁豪, 童裳伦. 色谱, 2020,38(5):522
[44]	Qian H L, Yan X P. Chinese Journal of Chromatography, 2020,38(1):22
[44]	钱海龙, 严秀平. 色谱, 2020,38(1):22
[45]	Kaneti Y V, Tang J, Salunkhe R R, et al. Sci Adv Mater, 2017,29(12):1604898
[46]	Lompe K M, Menard D, Barbeau B. Water Res, 2016,96:42
[47]	Filippou O, Deliyanni E A, Samanidou V F. J Chromatogr A, 2017,1479:20
[48]	Wang Y, Ma R Y, Xiao R B, et al. J Sep Sci, 2017,40(11):2451
[49]	Wang C, Liu L, Zhang Z H, et al. Food Anal Methods, 2016,9:80
[50]	Zhu L, Wang Y, Wang Y X, et al. Micropor Mesopor Mat, 2017,241:285
[51]	Yilmaz E, Soylak M. Talanta, 2016,158:152

Carbon base	Carbon based magnetic composite material	Analyte	Samples	Method	LOD	Recovery/ %		RSD/ %	Ref.
CNTs	Fe₃O₄/AMWNTs	pyrethroid pesticides	honey	GC	0.07-0.20 μg/L	78.4	-94.8	3.8-8.1	[10]
	MWCNT-Fe₃O₄	phthalate acid esters	yogurt-based drinking	GC-MS	10.00-24.00 ng/L		-	0.3-7.4	[11]
	MWCNT-MNP	polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons	milk, milk powder	GC-MS	0.040-0.075 μg/kg	86.1	-100.3	3.2-10.1	[12]
	Tol-MCNT	sulfonamides	milk	LC-HRMS	2.00-10.00 ng/L	86.6	-98.3	0.9-6.2	[13]
	M-N-CNTs	bisphenols	fruit juices	UHPLC-MS/MS	0.43-2.47 ng/L	90.6	-101.0	1.2-5.8	[14]
	PAMAM@Mag-CNTs	toxic alkaloids	meat, vegetable	UFLC-MS/MS	0.011-0.329 ng/g	83.4	-125.0	1.3-8.0	[15]
	PEG-MWCNTs-MNP	mycotoxins	real liquid milk	UHPLC-Q-Exactive HRMS	0.005-0.050 μg/kg	81.8	-106.4	2.1-8.5	[16]
	HCSs@Fe₃O₄- MWCNT-COOH	herbicides	wheat flour	HPLC-DAD	0.24-0.68 ng/g	88.8	-96.6	1.6-6.2	[17]
	Fe₃O₄/MWCNT@ND	vitamin B12	infant formula powder, cereal	HPLC-DAD	2.85 ng/mL	97.8	-103.1	4.3-6.1	[18]
	N-CNTCs	okadaic acid	mussel, oyster	HPLC-MS/MS	1.30 pg/mL	82.0	-107.0	1.8-2.5	[19]
	mMWCNT-ZrO₂-C18	polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons	edible oils	HPLC-DAD	0.06-0.55 ng/g	93.9	-113.3	3.9-6.0	[20]
G	Fe₃O₄@SiO₂@G	preservative	vegetables	GC-MS	0.21-11.50 μg/kg	78.3	-116.7	1.4-11.9	[21]
	MG@SiO₂-TMSPED	pesticides	tomato, grape	GC-μECD	0.23-0.30 μg/kg	82.0	-113.0	5.1-8.1	[22]
	mNi@N-GrT	tetracyclines	milk	HPLC	1.29-2.31 ng/mL	91.6	-109.7	2.2-5.7	[23]
	3D-G-Fe₃O₄	caffeine	food	GC-FID	0.10 μg/mL	93.1	-97.7	5.9-7.1	[24]
	3D-G-Fe₃O₄	organophosphorus pesticides	juice	GC-NPD	1.20-5.10 ng/L	86.6	-107.5	2.5-7.4	[25]
	3D-G-Fe₃O₄	chlorophenols	honey	HPLC-UV	1.00-1.50 ng/g	93.2	-98.9	4.1-4.6	[26]
GO	Fe₃O₄@GO	sulfonamides	milk	HPLC-MS/MS	0.02-0.13 μg/L	73.4	-97.4	1.0-8.2	[27]
	Fe₃O₄@SiO₂-GO/ MIL-101(Cr)	triazine herbicides	rice	HPLC	0.01-0.08 μg/kg	83.9	-103.5	0.5-8.7	[28]
	MGO	phthalate esters	bottled water	HPLC	0.004-0.013 mg/L	65.0	-126.0	0.6-6.0	[29]
	Fe₃O₄/GO	melamine	dairy products	HPLC	0.03 μg/L	97.2	-103.1	1.1-5.0	[30]
	Fe₃O₄/rGO	aflatoxins	vegetable oils	HPLC-PCD-FLD	0.01-0.02 μg/kg	80.4	-106.0	1.3-10.5	[31]
	rGO/ZnFe₂O₄	estrogens	fish	HPLC-DAD	0.01-0.02 ng/mL	73.5	-104.1	1.7-8.3	[32]
MOFs	MNPCs	organophosphorus pesticides	fruit	GC-FPD	0.018-0.045 μg/L	84.0	-116.0	3.5-9.7	[33]
AC	MBAC	phenylurea herbicides	juice	HPLC-UV	0.10-0.80 ng/mL	86.1	-104.1	4.0-6.8	[34]
BC	C/Fe₃O₄ NCs	triazole fungicides	fruit	GC-MS	0.12-0.55 μg/kg	82.1	-109.9	2.1-8.4	[35]
GC	YS-Fe₃O₄@GC	sulfonamides	milk, meat	HPLC	0.11-0.25 μg/L	77.2	-118.0	1.4-9.2	[36]

Carbon base	Carbon based magnetic composite material	Analyte	Samples	Method	LOD	Recovery/ %		RSD/ %	Ref.
CNTs	Fe₃O₄/AMWNTs	pyrethroid pesticides	honey	GC	0.07-0.20 μg/L	78.4	-94.8	3.8-8.1	[10]
	MWCNT-Fe₃O₄	phthalate acid esters	yogurt-based drinking	GC-MS	10.00-24.00 ng/L		-	0.3-7.4	[11]
	MWCNT-MNP	polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons	milk, milk powder	GC-MS	0.040-0.075 μg/kg	86.1	-100.3	3.2-10.1	[12]
	Tol-MCNT	sulfonamides	milk	LC-HRMS	2.00-10.00 ng/L	86.6	-98.3	0.9-6.2	[13]
	M-N-CNTs	bisphenols	fruit juices	UHPLC-MS/MS	0.43-2.47 ng/L	90.6	-101.0	1.2-5.8	[14]
	PAMAM@Mag-CNTs	toxic alkaloids	meat, vegetable	UFLC-MS/MS	0.011-0.329 ng/g	83.4	-125.0	1.3-8.0	[15]
	PEG-MWCNTs-MNP	mycotoxins	real liquid milk	UHPLC-Q-Exactive HRMS	0.005-0.050 μg/kg	81.8	-106.4	2.1-8.5	[16]
	HCSs@Fe₃O₄- MWCNT-COOH	herbicides	wheat flour	HPLC-DAD	0.24-0.68 ng/g	88.8	-96.6	1.6-6.2	[17]
	Fe₃O₄/MWCNT@ND	vitamin B12	infant formula powder, cereal	HPLC-DAD	2.85 ng/mL	97.8	-103.1	4.3-6.1	[18]
	N-CNTCs	okadaic acid	mussel, oyster	HPLC-MS/MS	1.30 pg/mL	82.0	-107.0	1.8-2.5	[19]
	mMWCNT-ZrO₂-C18	polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons	edible oils	HPLC-DAD	0.06-0.55 ng/g	93.9	-113.3	3.9-6.0	[20]
G	Fe₃O₄@SiO₂@G	preservative	vegetables	GC-MS	0.21-11.50 μg/kg	78.3	-116.7	1.4-11.9	[21]
	MG@SiO₂-TMSPED	pesticides	tomato, grape	GC-μECD	0.23-0.30 μg/kg	82.0	-113.0	5.1-8.1	[22]
	mNi@N-GrT	tetracyclines	milk	HPLC	1.29-2.31 ng/mL	91.6	-109.7	2.2-5.7	[23]
	3D-G-Fe₃O₄	caffeine	food	GC-FID	0.10 μg/mL	93.1	-97.7	5.9-7.1	[24]
	3D-G-Fe₃O₄	organophosphorus pesticides	juice	GC-NPD	1.20-5.10 ng/L	86.6	-107.5	2.5-7.4	[25]
	3D-G-Fe₃O₄	chlorophenols	honey	HPLC-UV	1.00-1.50 ng/g	93.2	-98.9	4.1-4.6	[26]
GO	Fe₃O₄@GO	sulfonamides	milk	HPLC-MS/MS	0.02-0.13 μg/L	73.4	-97.4	1.0-8.2	[27]
	Fe₃O₄@SiO₂-GO/ MIL-101(Cr)	triazine herbicides	rice	HPLC	0.01-0.08 μg/kg	83.9	-103.5	0.5-8.7	[28]
	MGO	phthalate esters	bottled water	HPLC	0.004-0.013 mg/L	65.0	-126.0	0.6-6.0	[29]
	Fe₃O₄/GO	melamine	dairy products	HPLC	0.03 μg/L	97.2	-103.1	1.1-5.0	[30]
	Fe₃O₄/rGO	aflatoxins	vegetable oils	HPLC-PCD-FLD	0.01-0.02 μg/kg	80.4	-106.0	1.3-10.5	[31]
	rGO/ZnFe₂O₄	estrogens	fish	HPLC-DAD	0.01-0.02 ng/mL	73.5	-104.1	1.7-8.3	[32]
MOFs	MNPCs	organophosphorus pesticides	fruit	GC-FPD	0.018-0.045 μg/L	84.0	-116.0	3.5-9.7	[33]
AC	MBAC	phenylurea herbicides	juice	HPLC-UV	0.10-0.80 ng/mL	86.1	-104.1	4.0-6.8	[34]
BC	C/Fe₃O₄ NCs	triazole fungicides	fruit	GC-MS	0.12-0.55 μg/kg	82.1	-109.9	2.1-8.4	[35]
GC	YS-Fe₃O₄@GC	sulfonamides	milk, meat	HPLC	0.11-0.25 μg/L	77.2	-118.0	1.4-9.2	[36]

基于碳基磁性材料的磁固相萃取技术在食品分析应用中的研究进展

Research progress in the application of magnetic solid phase extraction based on carbon based magnetic materials in food analysis

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

扫码分享

图/表 2

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	周然锋, 张惠贤, 尹小丽, 彭西甜. 新型纳米材料在农产品安全分析中的应用进展[J]. 色谱, 2023, 41(9): 731-741.
[2]	秦童童, 高莉, 赵文杰. 超交联多孔有机聚合物在柱固相萃取中的应用进展[J]. 色谱, 2023, 41(7): 554-561.
[3]	解伟亚, 朱晓晗, 梅宏成, 郭洪玲, 李亚军, 黄阳, 秦皓, 朱军, 胡灿. 基于功能材料的固相微萃取技术及其在法庭科学领域中的应用[J]. 色谱, 2023, 41(4): 302-311.
[4]	欧阳艺兰, 易琳, 邱露允, 张真庆. 色谱技术在肝素结构分析中的研究进展[J]. 色谱, 2023, 41(2): 107-121.
[5]	翟洪稳, 马红玉, 曹梅荣, 张明星, 马俊美, 张岩, 李强. 在线样品制备技术耦合液相色谱-质谱系统在食品危害物检测中的应用进展[J]. 色谱, 2023, 41(12): 1062-1072.
[6]	余涛, 陈立, 张文敏, 张兰, 卢巧梅. 微孔有机网络材料的合成方法及其在样品前处理中的应用进展[J]. 色谱, 2023, 41(12): 1052-1061.
[7]	王国秀, 陈永雷, 吕文娟, 陈宏丽, 陈兴国. 共价有机框架材料在毛细管电色谱中的应用进展[J]. 色谱, 2023, 41(10): 835-842.
[8]	闫美婷, 龙文雯, 陶雪平, 王丹, 夏之宁, 付琦峰. 金属有机骨架材料在色谱固定相构建及应用中的研究进展[J]. 色谱, 2023, 41(10): 879-890.
[9]	宋春颖, 金高娃, 俞东萍, 夏东海, 丰静, 郭志谋, 梁鑫淼. 超临界流体色谱固定相的发展及在天然产物中的应用[J]. 色谱, 2023, 41(10): 866-878.
[10]	蒋文倩, 陈宇媚, 毕文韬. 基于低共熔溶剂的多孔有机框架材料合成及其在固相萃取中的应用[J]. 色谱, 2023, 41(10): 901-910.
[11]	杨涵, 汤雯淇, 曾楚, 孟莎莎, 徐铭. 高效金属有机骨架气相色谱固定相的理性设计[J]. 色谱, 2023, 41(10): 853-865.
[12]	玛依热·阿不力提甫, 钟子豪, 白希. 制备气相色谱在挥发性成分分离中的应用研究进展[J]. 色谱, 2023, 41(1): 37-46.
[13]	邹晓伟, 刘星, 张建明. 薄层色谱与质谱联用的研究进展[J]. 色谱, 2023, 41(1): 24-36.
[14]	翟容容, 高雯, 李梦宁, 杨华. 离子淌度质谱技术在中药化学成分分析中的研究进展[J]. 色谱, 2022, 40(9): 782-787.
[15]	鲁晨辉, 张毅, 苏宇杰, 王文龙, 冯永巍. 食品中芳香族氨基酸的分离分析技术研究进展[J]. 色谱, 2022, 40(8): 686-693.