色谱 ›› 2022, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (4): 333-342.DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1123.2021.08010
收稿日期:
2021-08-14
出版日期:
2022-04-08
发布日期:
2022-04-01
通讯作者:
孙慧婧
基金资助:
SUN Huijing1,*(), LI Peiwen1, ZHANG Beibei1, CHEN Huiming2
Received:
2021-08-14
Online:
2022-04-08
Published:
2022-04-01
Contact:
SUN Huijing
Supported by:
摘要:
抗生素作为新型有机污染物在自然水体中被频繁检出,检出种类多且含量水平低,为了实现更加快速、全面、准确的高通量分析,研究开发了一种利用大体积直接进样测定水中7大类(磺胺类、林可酰胺类、喹诺酮类、大环内酯类、四环素类、头孢类及氯霉素类)42种抗生素的超高效液相色谱-三重四极杆质谱法。水样经0.22 μm滤膜过滤,加入Na2EDTA并调节pH值至6.0~8.0,加入内标混匀后,采用Phenomenex Kinetex C18柱(50 mm×30 mm, 2.6 μm),以0.1%(v/v)甲酸水溶液-乙腈作为流动相进行梯度洗脱,质谱智能化分时间段-多反应选择离子监测(Schedule-MRM)模式进行检测。42种抗生素在相关线性范围内线性良好(r=0.9949~0.9995),回收率为80.1%~125%,相对标准偏差为0.8%~12.2%,方法检出限为0.015~3.561 ng/L。将该方法应用于10份水源水和5份末梢水的检测,结果显示在42种抗生素中,12种抗生素有检出,包括磺胺类、大环内酯类、林可酰胺类和氯霉素类,其在水源水中的检出率达100%;林可霉素和氯霉素是检出质量浓度最高的两种抗生素,它们的质量浓度范围分别为3.83~13.8和24.8~33.6 ng/L。该方法从检出限和回收率两方面与标准方法和文献报道进行了比较,检出限及回收率均满足要求。该方法与传统前处理方法相比具有简单、快速、绿色、精密度高、准确度高、消耗样品量小的优点,能用于地表水、地下水、末梢水等较为洁净水体中42种痕量水平的抗生素测定。
中图分类号:
孙慧婧, 李佩纹, 张蓓蓓, 陈慧敏. 大体积直接进样-超高效液相色谱-三重四极杆质谱法测定水中7大类42种抗生素残留[J]. 色谱, 2022, 40(4): 333-342.
SUN Huijing, LI Peiwen, ZHANG Beibei, CHEN Huiming. Determination of 42 antibiotic residues in seven categories in water using large volume direct injection by ultra high performance liquid chromatography-triple quadrupole mass spectrometry[J]. Chinese Journal of Chromatography, 2022, 40(4): 333-342.
Compound | tR/min | Precursor ion (m/z) | Product ion (m/z) | Declustering potential/V | Collison energy/eV | IS |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sulfonamides (SAs) | ||||||
Sulfachloropyridazine (SCP) | 5.2 | 285.1 | 156.1* | 21 | 20.3 | SMR-D4 |
92.0 | 21 | 39.2 | ||||
Sulfadiazine (SDZ) | 3.1 | 251.1 | 156.0* | 40 | 22.0 | |
92.0 | 40 | 32.1 | ||||
Sulfadimethoxine (SDM) | 6.3 | 311.1 | 156.1* | 120 | 28.0 | |
108.2 | 140 | 47.0 | ||||
Sulfamerazine (SMR) | 4.0 | 265.2 | 172.1* | 70 | 23.0 | |
156.1 | 70 | 23.0 | ||||
Sulfamethazine (SMZ) | 4.6 | 279.2 | 186.1* | 45 | 24.0 | |
124.2 | 45 | 33.0 | ||||
Sulfamethizole (SMTZ) | 4.6 | 271.0 | 156.2* | 30 | 19.3 | |
108.0 | 30 | 35.0 | ||||
Sulfamethoxazole (SMX) | 5.5 | 254.0 | 156.1* | 49 | 23.0 | |
108.0 | 49 | 31.0 | ||||
Sulfathiazole (STZ) | 3.7 | 256.1 | 156.1* | 38 | 21.0 | |
108.1 | 38 | 31.0 | ||||
Sulfapyridine (SPD) | 3.8 | 250.3 | 184.3* | 60 | 25.0 | |
156.1 | 60 | 23.0 | ||||
Sulfisomidine (SM2) | 3.0 | 279.2 | 186.1* | 70 | 23.0 | |
124.4 | 70 | 30.0 | ||||
Sulfisoxazole (SIA) | 5.7 | 268.2 | 156.0* | 60 | 20.0 | |
113.3 | 60 | 19.0 | ||||
Sulfameter (SMT) | 4.7 | 281.2 | 215.3* | 60 | 25.0 | |
156.0 | 60 | 25.0 | ||||
Sulfamonomethoxine (SMM) | 5.1 | 281.1 | 156.1* | 100 | 25.0 | |
215.1 | 100 | 25.0 | ||||
Sulfachloropyrazine (SPZ) | 6.1 | 285.2 | 156.1* | 120 | 22.0 | |
92.1 | 120 | 37.0 | ||||
Sulfaquinoxaline (SQ) | 6.3 | 301.1 | 156.0* | 120 | 22.0 | |
92.2 | 120 | 40.0 | ||||
Lincosamides (LINs) | ||||||
Clindamycin (CLIN) | 5.6 | 425.3 | 377.2* | 80 | 27.0 | CLIN-D3 |
126.2 | 80 | 34.0 | ||||
Lincomycin (LCM) | 3.9 | 407.2 | 126.2* | 120 | 35.0 | |
359.2 | 120 | 25.0 | ||||
Tetracyclines (TCs) | ||||||
Oxytetracycline (OTC) | 4.4 | 461.3 | 443.2* | 100 | 19.0 | TC-D6 |
426.2 | 100 | 27.0 | ||||
Chlortetracycline (CTC) | 5.2 | 479.2 | 462.0* | 120 | 24.0 | |
444.1 | 120 | 31.0 | ||||
Tetracycline (TC) | 4.5 | 445.2 | 427.3* | 120 | 19.0 | |
410.3 | 120 | 27.0 | ||||
Doxycycline (DOX) | 4.7 | 445.2 | 428.1* | 140 | 27.0 | |
410.2 | 140 | 34.0 | ||||
Minocycline (MIC) | 4.1 | 458.2 | 441.2* | 130 | 25.0 | |
352.2 | 130 | 40.0 | ||||
Quinolones (QNs) | ||||||
Ofloxacin (OFX) | 4.5 | 362.3 | 318.0* | 140 | 26.0 | OFX-D3 |
261.0 | 140 | 38.0 | ||||
Compound | tR/min | Precursor ion (m/z) | Product ion (m/z) | Declustering potential/V | Collison energy/eV | IS |
Norfloxacin (NOR) | 4.5 | 320.1 | 302.3* | 140 | 27.0 | |
276.1 | 140 | 24.0 | ||||
Sarafloxacin (SAR) | 5.2 | 386.2 | 342.3* | 100 | 25.0 | |
299.0 | 100 | 38.0 | ||||
Enrofloxacin (ENR) | 4.9 | 360.0 | 316.2* | 100 | 27.0 | |
245.2 | 100 | 36.0 | ||||
Ciprofloxacin (CIP) | 4.6 | 332.1 | 314.0* | 90 | 31.0 | |
288.3 | 90 | 25.0 | ||||
Lomefloxacin (LOM) | 4.7 | 352.0 | 265.2* | 100 | 32.0 | |
308.1 | 100 | 23.0 | ||||
Macrolides (MLs) | ||||||
Roxithromycin (ROX) | 7.4 | 837.3 | 679.2* | 100 | 30.0 | ROX-D7 |
158.1 | 100 | 38.0 | ||||
Clarithromycin (CLA) | 7.3 | 748.3 | 590.4* | 120 | 27.0 | |
158.2 | 120 | 33.0 | ||||
Tylosin (TS) | 6.8 | 916.5 | 772.4* | 130 | 41.0 | |
174.1 | 130 | 47.0 | ||||
Spiramycin (SPM) | 5.5 | 843.4 | 174.0* | 120 | 45.0 | |
540.0 | 120 | 42.0 | ||||
Erythromycin (ERY) | 6.5 | 734.3 | 576.2* | 80 | 27.0 | |
158.3 | 80 | 35.0 | ||||
Azithromycin (AZI) | 5.5 | 749.7 | 591.5* | 160 | 40.0 | |
573.6 | 160 | 47.0 | ||||
Cephalosporins (CEs) | ||||||
Cefotaxime (CTX) | 4.5 | 456.0 | 396.0* | 60 | 15.0 | CE-D5 |
324.0 | 60 | 19.0 | ||||
Cephapirin (CP) | 3.6 | 424.2 | 292.2* | 60 | 21.0 | |
152.0 | 60 | 29.0 | ||||
Cefaclor (CEC) | 3.8 | 368.0 | 174.2* | 29 | 20.0 | |
106.1 | 29 | 39.0 | ||||
Cefazolin (CFZ) | 4.9 | 455.1 | 323.0* | 37 | 15.0 | |
156.0 | 37 | 20.0 | ||||
Cephalexin (CPX) | 4.2 | 348.2 | 174.0* | 80 | 23.0 | |
158.2 | 80 | 15.0 | ||||
Chloramphenicols (CMs) | ||||||
Chloramphenicol (CM) | 4.4 | 321.0 | 257.1* | -40 | -15.0 | CM-D5 |
152.0 | -40 | -24.0 | ||||
Thiamphenicol (TAP) | 3.2 | 354.0 | 290.2* | -50 | -17.0 | |
185.1 | -50 | -27.0 | ||||
Florfenicol (FFC) | 4.1 | 356.0 | 336.0* | -40 | -13.0 | |
185.0 | -40 | -26.0 | ||||
IS | ||||||
Sulfamerazine-D4(SMR-D4) | 4.0 | 269.2 | 172.1 | 70 | 23.0 | |
Cephalexin-D5(CPX-D5) | 4.1 | 353.0 | 179.0 | 80 | 23.0 | |
Ofloxacin-D3(OFX-D3) | 4.4 | 365.2 | 321.1 | 140 | 26.0 | |
Tetracycline-D6(TC-D6) | 4.6 | 451.4 | 416.2 | 120 | 27.0 | |
Clindamycin-D3(CLIN-D3) | 5.5 | 428.0 | 129.0 | 80 | 34.0 | |
Roxithromycin-D7(ROX-D7) | 7.4 | 844.3 | 686.2 | 100 | 30.0 | |
Chloramphenicol-D5(CM-D5) | 4.4 | 326.0 | 157.0 | -24 | -40.0 |
表1 42种抗生素的质谱参数
Table 1 MS parameters for the 42 antibiotics
Compound | tR/min | Precursor ion (m/z) | Product ion (m/z) | Declustering potential/V | Collison energy/eV | IS |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sulfonamides (SAs) | ||||||
Sulfachloropyridazine (SCP) | 5.2 | 285.1 | 156.1* | 21 | 20.3 | SMR-D4 |
92.0 | 21 | 39.2 | ||||
Sulfadiazine (SDZ) | 3.1 | 251.1 | 156.0* | 40 | 22.0 | |
92.0 | 40 | 32.1 | ||||
Sulfadimethoxine (SDM) | 6.3 | 311.1 | 156.1* | 120 | 28.0 | |
108.2 | 140 | 47.0 | ||||
Sulfamerazine (SMR) | 4.0 | 265.2 | 172.1* | 70 | 23.0 | |
156.1 | 70 | 23.0 | ||||
Sulfamethazine (SMZ) | 4.6 | 279.2 | 186.1* | 45 | 24.0 | |
124.2 | 45 | 33.0 | ||||
Sulfamethizole (SMTZ) | 4.6 | 271.0 | 156.2* | 30 | 19.3 | |
108.0 | 30 | 35.0 | ||||
Sulfamethoxazole (SMX) | 5.5 | 254.0 | 156.1* | 49 | 23.0 | |
108.0 | 49 | 31.0 | ||||
Sulfathiazole (STZ) | 3.7 | 256.1 | 156.1* | 38 | 21.0 | |
108.1 | 38 | 31.0 | ||||
Sulfapyridine (SPD) | 3.8 | 250.3 | 184.3* | 60 | 25.0 | |
156.1 | 60 | 23.0 | ||||
Sulfisomidine (SM2) | 3.0 | 279.2 | 186.1* | 70 | 23.0 | |
124.4 | 70 | 30.0 | ||||
Sulfisoxazole (SIA) | 5.7 | 268.2 | 156.0* | 60 | 20.0 | |
113.3 | 60 | 19.0 | ||||
Sulfameter (SMT) | 4.7 | 281.2 | 215.3* | 60 | 25.0 | |
156.0 | 60 | 25.0 | ||||
Sulfamonomethoxine (SMM) | 5.1 | 281.1 | 156.1* | 100 | 25.0 | |
215.1 | 100 | 25.0 | ||||
Sulfachloropyrazine (SPZ) | 6.1 | 285.2 | 156.1* | 120 | 22.0 | |
92.1 | 120 | 37.0 | ||||
Sulfaquinoxaline (SQ) | 6.3 | 301.1 | 156.0* | 120 | 22.0 | |
92.2 | 120 | 40.0 | ||||
Lincosamides (LINs) | ||||||
Clindamycin (CLIN) | 5.6 | 425.3 | 377.2* | 80 | 27.0 | CLIN-D3 |
126.2 | 80 | 34.0 | ||||
Lincomycin (LCM) | 3.9 | 407.2 | 126.2* | 120 | 35.0 | |
359.2 | 120 | 25.0 | ||||
Tetracyclines (TCs) | ||||||
Oxytetracycline (OTC) | 4.4 | 461.3 | 443.2* | 100 | 19.0 | TC-D6 |
426.2 | 100 | 27.0 | ||||
Chlortetracycline (CTC) | 5.2 | 479.2 | 462.0* | 120 | 24.0 | |
444.1 | 120 | 31.0 | ||||
Tetracycline (TC) | 4.5 | 445.2 | 427.3* | 120 | 19.0 | |
410.3 | 120 | 27.0 | ||||
Doxycycline (DOX) | 4.7 | 445.2 | 428.1* | 140 | 27.0 | |
410.2 | 140 | 34.0 | ||||
Minocycline (MIC) | 4.1 | 458.2 | 441.2* | 130 | 25.0 | |
352.2 | 130 | 40.0 | ||||
Quinolones (QNs) | ||||||
Ofloxacin (OFX) | 4.5 | 362.3 | 318.0* | 140 | 26.0 | OFX-D3 |
261.0 | 140 | 38.0 | ||||
Compound | tR/min | Precursor ion (m/z) | Product ion (m/z) | Declustering potential/V | Collison energy/eV | IS |
Norfloxacin (NOR) | 4.5 | 320.1 | 302.3* | 140 | 27.0 | |
276.1 | 140 | 24.0 | ||||
Sarafloxacin (SAR) | 5.2 | 386.2 | 342.3* | 100 | 25.0 | |
299.0 | 100 | 38.0 | ||||
Enrofloxacin (ENR) | 4.9 | 360.0 | 316.2* | 100 | 27.0 | |
245.2 | 100 | 36.0 | ||||
Ciprofloxacin (CIP) | 4.6 | 332.1 | 314.0* | 90 | 31.0 | |
288.3 | 90 | 25.0 | ||||
Lomefloxacin (LOM) | 4.7 | 352.0 | 265.2* | 100 | 32.0 | |
308.1 | 100 | 23.0 | ||||
Macrolides (MLs) | ||||||
Roxithromycin (ROX) | 7.4 | 837.3 | 679.2* | 100 | 30.0 | ROX-D7 |
158.1 | 100 | 38.0 | ||||
Clarithromycin (CLA) | 7.3 | 748.3 | 590.4* | 120 | 27.0 | |
158.2 | 120 | 33.0 | ||||
Tylosin (TS) | 6.8 | 916.5 | 772.4* | 130 | 41.0 | |
174.1 | 130 | 47.0 | ||||
Spiramycin (SPM) | 5.5 | 843.4 | 174.0* | 120 | 45.0 | |
540.0 | 120 | 42.0 | ||||
Erythromycin (ERY) | 6.5 | 734.3 | 576.2* | 80 | 27.0 | |
158.3 | 80 | 35.0 | ||||
Azithromycin (AZI) | 5.5 | 749.7 | 591.5* | 160 | 40.0 | |
573.6 | 160 | 47.0 | ||||
Cephalosporins (CEs) | ||||||
Cefotaxime (CTX) | 4.5 | 456.0 | 396.0* | 60 | 15.0 | CE-D5 |
324.0 | 60 | 19.0 | ||||
Cephapirin (CP) | 3.6 | 424.2 | 292.2* | 60 | 21.0 | |
152.0 | 60 | 29.0 | ||||
Cefaclor (CEC) | 3.8 | 368.0 | 174.2* | 29 | 20.0 | |
106.1 | 29 | 39.0 | ||||
Cefazolin (CFZ) | 4.9 | 455.1 | 323.0* | 37 | 15.0 | |
156.0 | 37 | 20.0 | ||||
Cephalexin (CPX) | 4.2 | 348.2 | 174.0* | 80 | 23.0 | |
158.2 | 80 | 15.0 | ||||
Chloramphenicols (CMs) | ||||||
Chloramphenicol (CM) | 4.4 | 321.0 | 257.1* | -40 | -15.0 | CM-D5 |
152.0 | -40 | -24.0 | ||||
Thiamphenicol (TAP) | 3.2 | 354.0 | 290.2* | -50 | -17.0 | |
185.1 | -50 | -27.0 | ||||
Florfenicol (FFC) | 4.1 | 356.0 | 336.0* | -40 | -13.0 | |
185.0 | -40 | -26.0 | ||||
IS | ||||||
Sulfamerazine-D4(SMR-D4) | 4.0 | 269.2 | 172.1 | 70 | 23.0 | |
Cephalexin-D5(CPX-D5) | 4.1 | 353.0 | 179.0 | 80 | 23.0 | |
Ofloxacin-D3(OFX-D3) | 4.4 | 365.2 | 321.1 | 140 | 26.0 | |
Tetracycline-D6(TC-D6) | 4.6 | 451.4 | 416.2 | 120 | 27.0 | |
Clindamycin-D3(CLIN-D3) | 5.5 | 428.0 | 129.0 | 80 | 34.0 | |
Roxithromycin-D7(ROX-D7) | 7.4 | 844.3 | 686.2 | 100 | 30.0 | |
Chloramphenicol-D5(CM-D5) | 4.4 | 326.0 | 157.0 | -24 | -40.0 |
图6 采用大体积直接进样法与固相萃取法时42种 抗生素回收率的比较
Fig. 6 Comparison of recoveries of the 42 antibiotics using large volume direct injection method and SPE method LVI represents the recoveries of the antibiotics using large volume direct injection method; HLB, MCX represent the recoveries of the antibiotics using SPE method.
Compound | MDLs/(ng/L) | ||
---|---|---|---|
This method | Standards | Literatures | |
SAs | 0.015-0.349 | 0.3-1.2[ | 0.19-1.57[ |
LINs | 0.022-0.060 | 0.8[ | 0.48-6.04[ |
TCs | 1.110-3.201 | 1.2-51[ | 4.72-11.23[ |
QNs | 0.582-2.004 | 1.8-170[ | 0.54-13.55[ |
MLs | 0.312-3.561 | 0.2-13[ | 0.31-3.99[ |
CEs | 0.122-3.064 | 10[ | 0.77-13.37[ |
CMs | 0.172-0.231 | / | 0.65-0.77[ |
表2 本方法与标准方法及其他文献方法检出限的比较
Table 2 Comparison of method detection limits (MDLs) of this study with standards and other literatures
Compound | MDLs/(ng/L) | ||
---|---|---|---|
This method | Standards | Literatures | |
SAs | 0.015-0.349 | 0.3-1.2[ | 0.19-1.57[ |
LINs | 0.022-0.060 | 0.8[ | 0.48-6.04[ |
TCs | 1.110-3.201 | 1.2-51[ | 4.72-11.23[ |
QNs | 0.582-2.004 | 1.8-170[ | 0.54-13.55[ |
MLs | 0.312-3.561 | 0.2-13[ | 0.31-3.99[ |
CEs | 0.122-3.064 | 10[ | 0.77-13.37[ |
CMs | 0.172-0.231 | / | 0.65-0.77[ |
Compound | Recoveries/% | |
---|---|---|
Large volume direct injection (this study) | Solid phase extraction (literature) | |
SAs | 80.2-125 | 2-134[ |
LINs | 94.0-110 | 62-112[ |
TCs | 95.6-122 | 50.2-94.6[ |
QNs | 80.1-108 | 47-126[ |
MLs | 81.7-116 | 54.2-98.4[ |
CEs | 86.9-115 | 129-131[ |
CM | 83.1-101 | 53-81[ |
表3 与其他文献方法的回收率比较
Table 3 Comparison of recoveries with other literature methods
Compound | Recoveries/% | |
---|---|---|
Large volume direct injection (this study) | Solid phase extraction (literature) | |
SAs | 80.2-125 | 2-134[ |
LINs | 94.0-110 | 62-112[ |
TCs | 95.6-122 | 50.2-94.6[ |
QNs | 80.1-108 | 47-126[ |
MLs | 81.7-116 | 54.2-98.4[ |
CEs | 86.9-115 | 129-131[ |
CM | 83.1-101 | 53-81[ |
Site | Contents/(ng/L) | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCP | SDZ | SMZ | SMX | SM2 | ROX | CLA | ERY | CLIN | LCM | TAP | FFC | |
S1 | 3.82 | 4.02 | 0.66 | 4.78 | 0.56 | 2.70 | 2.18 | 2.71 | 2.45 | 12.4 | 6.80 | 31.4 |
S2 | 3.40 | 3.03 | 0.64 | 4.43 | 0.82 | 2.92 | 2.38 | 2.81 | 2.57 | 11.5 | 6.30 | 29.6 |
S3 | 3.33 | 2.60 | 0.46 | 3.91 | 0.58 | 2.74 | 2.36 | 2.67 | 2.09 | 11.2 | 5.18 | 23.9 |
S4 | 3.83 | 2.57 | 0.66 | 4.44 | 0.69 | 3.24 | 2.53 | 2.58 | 3.38 | 13.7 | 4.92 | 28.1 |
S5 | 3.54 | 3.00 | 0.56 | 4.53 | 0.65 | 2.84 | 2.79 | 2.95 | 3.55 | 12.6 | 4.88 | 27.1 |
S6 | 3.84 | 2.38 | 0.57 | 4.98 | 0.66 | 3.36 | 2.71 | 2.60 | 2.92 | 12.5 | 5.35 | 25.5 |
S7 | 3.58 | 6.56 | 0.52 | 4.09 | 0.59 | 2.69 | 2.25 | 2.49 | 2.57 | 13.1 | 4.53 | 24.8 |
S8 | 3.20 | 4.46 | 0.65 | 3.76 | 0.62 | 2.94 | 5.03 | 2.21 | 2.48 | 13.8 | 7.57 | 33.6 |
S9 | 3.82 | 2.89 | 0.50 | 4.17 | 0.59 | 4.02 | 2.64 | 2.26 | 2.78 | 13.0 | 6.68 | 29.3 |
S10 | 3.06 | 0.22 | ND | 3.37 | ND | ND | ND | ND | 1.22 | 3.83 | 5.74 | 31.7 |
G1 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
G2 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
G3 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
G4 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
G5 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
表4 实际水样中抗生素的阳性检测结果
Table 4 Positive detection results of antibiotics in actual samples
Site | Contents/(ng/L) | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCP | SDZ | SMZ | SMX | SM2 | ROX | CLA | ERY | CLIN | LCM | TAP | FFC | |
S1 | 3.82 | 4.02 | 0.66 | 4.78 | 0.56 | 2.70 | 2.18 | 2.71 | 2.45 | 12.4 | 6.80 | 31.4 |
S2 | 3.40 | 3.03 | 0.64 | 4.43 | 0.82 | 2.92 | 2.38 | 2.81 | 2.57 | 11.5 | 6.30 | 29.6 |
S3 | 3.33 | 2.60 | 0.46 | 3.91 | 0.58 | 2.74 | 2.36 | 2.67 | 2.09 | 11.2 | 5.18 | 23.9 |
S4 | 3.83 | 2.57 | 0.66 | 4.44 | 0.69 | 3.24 | 2.53 | 2.58 | 3.38 | 13.7 | 4.92 | 28.1 |
S5 | 3.54 | 3.00 | 0.56 | 4.53 | 0.65 | 2.84 | 2.79 | 2.95 | 3.55 | 12.6 | 4.88 | 27.1 |
S6 | 3.84 | 2.38 | 0.57 | 4.98 | 0.66 | 3.36 | 2.71 | 2.60 | 2.92 | 12.5 | 5.35 | 25.5 |
S7 | 3.58 | 6.56 | 0.52 | 4.09 | 0.59 | 2.69 | 2.25 | 2.49 | 2.57 | 13.1 | 4.53 | 24.8 |
S8 | 3.20 | 4.46 | 0.65 | 3.76 | 0.62 | 2.94 | 5.03 | 2.21 | 2.48 | 13.8 | 7.57 | 33.6 |
S9 | 3.82 | 2.89 | 0.50 | 4.17 | 0.59 | 4.02 | 2.64 | 2.26 | 2.78 | 13.0 | 6.68 | 29.3 |
S10 | 3.06 | 0.22 | ND | 3.37 | ND | ND | ND | ND | 1.22 | 3.83 | 5.74 | 31.7 |
G1 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
G2 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
G3 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
G4 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
G5 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
|
[1] | 夏宝林, 汪仕韬, 殷晶晶, 张维益, 杨娜, 刘强, 吴海晶. 自动上样固相萃取-超高效液相色谱-串联质谱法同时测定水中9类43种抗菌药物残留[J]. 色谱, 2023, 41(7): 591-601. |
[2] | 王园媛, 李璐璐, 吕佳, 陈永艳, 张岚. 固相萃取-超高效液相色谱-三重四极杆质谱法测定饮用水中13种卤代苯醌类消毒副产物[J]. 色谱, 2023, 41(6): 482-489. |
[3] | 李振环, 胡小键, 陆一夫, 谢琳娜, 朱英. 基于高通量全自动固相萃取的超高效液相色谱-串联质谱法测定人尿中16种抗生素和4种β-受体激动剂[J]. 色谱, 2023, 41(5): 397-408. |
[4] | 王锦, 叶开晓, 田艳, 刘珂, 梁柳玲, 李青倩, 黄宁, 王欣婷. 固相萃取-高效液相色谱-串联质谱法同时测定环境水样中22种抗生素[J]. 色谱, 2023, 41(3): 241-249. |
[5] | 曲涛, 陈阳, 杨长军, 刘其耸, 陈惠, 何志勇, 王召君, 陈洁, 曾茂茂. 松花粉干预卵巢早衰大鼠肝脏的广泛靶向代谢组学分析[J]. 色谱, 2023, 41(1): 47-57. |
[6] | 冯军军, 姜海云, 王静, 景正义, 张帆, 谭天宇, 贺锋, 江利华, 李海芹, 常世敏, 李腾飞. QuEChERS-高效液相色谱-串联质谱法同时测定豆芽中40种植物生长调节剂、杀菌剂、杀虫剂和抗生素类药物残留[J]. 色谱, 2022, 40(9): 843-853. |
[7] | 张秀尧, 蔡欣欣, 张晓艺, 李瑞芬, 赵云峰. 免疫亲和柱净化-超高效液相色谱-三重四极杆质谱法高灵敏测定尿液和血浆中3种鹅膏毒肽[J]. 色谱, 2022, 40(5): 443-451. |
[8] | 凌慧娟, 吴阁格, 李爽, 周乾, 李春欣, 马继平. 基于金属有机骨架复合气凝胶的分散固相萃取-超高效液相色谱-串联质谱法测定水中5种非甾体类抗炎药[J]. 色谱, 2022, 40(4): 323-332. |
[9] | 陈永艳, 吕佳, 张岚, 叶必雄, 金宁. 在线固相萃取-超高效液相色谱-三重四极杆质谱法测定水源水和饮用水中107种典型农药及代谢产物[J]. 色谱, 2022, 40(12): 1064-1075. |
[10] | 宋畅, 刘畅, 马紫玉, 潘瑞蓉, 施海蔚, 孔德昭, 张景慧, 沈薇, 唐盛. 基于核酸适配体信号置换结合循环扩增的液相色谱法检测4种生物胺[J]. 色谱, 2022, 40(11): 1014-1021. |
[11] | 王盼, 马继平, 李爽, 程嘉雯, 邹宗岳. 基于共价有机骨架材料的磁固相萃取-超高效液相色谱-串联质谱法测定水中4种杀菌剂[J]. 色谱, 2022, 40(11): 988-997. |
[12] | 纪雪峰, 李爽, 吴阁格, 赵琳, 马继平. 基于阳离子型金属有机骨架混合基质膜的分散固相萃取-超高效液相色谱-串联质谱法测定水中7种苯氧羧酸类除草剂[J]. 色谱, 2021, 39(8): 896-904. |
[13] | 胡钰, 朱青青, 胡立刚, 廖春阳. 超高效液相色谱-串联质谱法同时测定土壤中30种抗生素[J]. 色谱, 2021, 39(8): 878-888. |
[14] | 柴佩君, 宋志花, 刘万卉, 薛俊萍, 王硕, 刘金秋, 李金花. 碳点在抗生素分析检测中的应用[J]. 色谱, 2021, 39(8): 816-826. |
[15] | 杨松, 邹楠, 高云, 许乐园, 张文文, 潘灿平, 慕卫. 固相萃取-超高效液相色谱-串联质谱法检测环境水体中18种农药残留[J]. 色谱, 2020, 38(7): 826-832. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||