Chinese Journal of Chromatography ›› 2020, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (5): 547-553.DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1123.2019.09003
Previous Articles Next Articles
SONG Chunying1,2, ZHANG Huarong3, GUO Zhimou1,3, YAN Jingyu1,3, JIN Gaowa1,3,*(), LIANG Xinmiao1,3
Received:
2019-09-02
Online:
2020-05-08
Published:
2020-12-10
Contact:
JIN Gaowa
Supported by:
SONG Chunying, ZHANG Huarong, GUO Zhimou, YAN Jingyu, JIN Gaowa, LIANG Xinmiao. Determination of five protopanaxadiol ginsenosides in ginseng by solid-phase extraction-ultra performance liquid chromatography[J]. Chinese Journal of Chromatography, 2020, 38(5): 547-553.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.chrom-china.com/EN/10.3724/SP.J.1123.2019.09003
Fig. 2 Chromatograms of ginseng extract with different SPE eluents SPE eluent: 2 mL ethanol/water; ethanol volume percentage: (a) 80%, (b) 70%, (c) 60%, (d) 50%.HPLC mobile phase A: ACN; B: H2O; gradient elution time: 0-10 min, 19%A-19%A; 10-16 min, 19%A-29%A; 16-20 min, 29%A-29%A; 20-28 min, 29%A-40%A; 28-34 min, 40%A-90%A; 34-40 min, 90%A-100%A; flow rate: 0.3 mL/min; detection wavelength: 203 nm; column temperature: 30 ℃.Peak identifications: 1. Rb1; 2. Rc; 3. Rb2; 4. Rb3; 5. Rd.
Fig. 3 Chromatograms of ginseng extract with different SPE eluent volumes SPE eluent: 70% (v/v) ethanol/water; volume: (a) 1st 1 mL, (b) 2nd 1 mL, (c) 3rd 1 mL, (d) 4th 1 mL. The chromatographic separation conditions and the peak identifications were the same as those in Fig. 2.
Fig. 4 Effect of the SPE processes on the ginseng extract a. without SPE; b. loading effluent of SPE; c. cleaning effluent of SPE; d. eluent of SPE.The chromatographic separation conditions and the peak identifications were the same as those in Fig. 2.
Target | Linear equation | Linear range/ (μg/mL) | r2 | LOD/ (μg/g) | LOQ/ (μg/g) |
y: peak area; x: mass concentration of the target compound (μg/mL). | |||||
Rb1 | y=9037.4x-21085 | 5-500 | 0.9994 | 1.51 | 5.04 |
Rc | y=9441.5x-25693 | 5-500 | 0.9996 | 1.37 | 4.57 |
Rb2 | y=90443.5x-20783 | 5-500 | 0.9997 | 1.45 | 4.84 |
Rb3 | y=9459.8x-39486 | 5-500 | 0.9993 | 1.41 | 4.70 |
Rd | y=8315.9x-53136 | 5-500 | 0.9997 | 2.56 | 8.54 |
Table 1 Linear equations, linear ranges, correlation efficients (r2), LODs, and LOQs of the five reference standards
Target | Linear equation | Linear range/ (μg/mL) | r2 | LOD/ (μg/g) | LOQ/ (μg/g) |
y: peak area; x: mass concentration of the target compound (μg/mL). | |||||
Rb1 | y=9037.4x-21085 | 5-500 | 0.9994 | 1.51 | 5.04 |
Rc | y=9441.5x-25693 | 5-500 | 0.9996 | 1.37 | 4.57 |
Rb2 | y=90443.5x-20783 | 5-500 | 0.9997 | 1.45 | 4.84 |
Rb3 | y=9459.8x-39486 | 5-500 | 0.9993 | 1.41 | 4.70 |
Rd | y=8315.9x-53136 | 5-500 | 0.9997 | 2.56 | 8.54 |
Target | Precision (RSD/%, n=6) | Stability (RSD/%, n=8) | Repeatabilities | |
Intra-day RSD/% (n=6) | Inter-day RSD/% (n=8) | |||
Rb1 | 0.96 | 1.00 | 5.35 | 5.56 |
Rc | 0.90 | 0.95 | 6.47 | 6.34 |
Rb2 | 0.92 | 0.98 | 6.23 | 6.34 |
Rb3 | 1.32 | 2.48 | 5.69 | 5.59 |
Rd | 2.15 | 2.62 | 5.97 | 6.06 |
Table 2 Precisions, stabilities, and repeatabilities of the method
Target | Precision (RSD/%, n=6) | Stability (RSD/%, n=8) | Repeatabilities | |
Intra-day RSD/% (n=6) | Inter-day RSD/% (n=8) | |||
Rb1 | 0.96 | 1.00 | 5.35 | 5.56 |
Rc | 0.90 | 0.95 | 6.47 | 6.34 |
Rb2 | 0.92 | 0.98 | 6.23 | 6.34 |
Rb3 | 1.32 | 2.48 | 5.69 | 5.59 |
Rd | 2.15 | 2.62 | 5.97 | 6.06 |
Target | Background/ mg | Added/ mg | Found/ mg | Average recovery/% | RSD/ % |
Rb1 | 0.14 | 0.19 | 0.32 | 95.27 | 3.19 |
Rc | 0.10 | 0.12 | 0.20 | 91.31 | 1.65 |
Rb2 | 0.075 | 0.11 | 0.16 | 87.16 | 3.76 |
Rb3 | 0.012 | 0.015 | 0.025 | 94.87 | 4.02 |
Rd | 0.065 | 0.072 | 0.14 | 101.92 | 1.54 |
Table 3 Spiked recoveries of the five compounds in real samples (n=6)
Target | Background/ mg | Added/ mg | Found/ mg | Average recovery/% | RSD/ % |
Rb1 | 0.14 | 0.19 | 0.32 | 95.27 | 3.19 |
Rc | 0.10 | 0.12 | 0.20 | 91.31 | 1.65 |
Rb2 | 0.075 | 0.11 | 0.16 | 87.16 | 3.76 |
Rb3 | 0.012 | 0.015 | 0.025 | 94.87 | 4.02 |
Rd | 0.065 | 0.072 | 0.14 | 101.92 | 1.54 |
Sample | Contents/% (RSD/%, n=3) | ||||
Rb1 | Rc | Rb2 | Rb3 | Rd | |
A | 0.118 | 0.064 | 0.074 | 0.010 | 0.050 |
(1.60) | (1.60) | (1.08) | (4.95) | (2.15) | |
B | 0.100 | 0.048 | 0.055 | 0.008 | 0.049 |
(2.92) | (1.85) | (3.04) | (3.51) | (1.74) | |
C | 0.140 | 0.058 | 0.068 | 0.009 | 0.052 |
(4.62) | (1.11) | (1.48) | (3.25) | (3.62) | |
D | 0.140 | 0.059 | 0.070 | 0.010 | 0.057 |
(1.32) | (0.75) | (0.64) | (0.92) | (0.38) | |
E | 0.160 | 0.077 | 0.080 | 0.010 | 0.055 |
(1.13) | (3.32) | (4.42) | (4.95) | (5.13) | |
F | 0.210 | 0.096 | 0.120 | 0.021 | 0.056 |
(0.98) | (1.12) | (1.26) | (0.96) | (0.80) | |
G | 0.170 | 0.089 | 0.110 | 0.017 | 0.068 |
(1.10) | (3.06) | (2.95) | (6.43) | (2.26) |
Table 4 Contents of the five compounds in different ginseng samples
Sample | Contents/% (RSD/%, n=3) | ||||
Rb1 | Rc | Rb2 | Rb3 | Rd | |
A | 0.118 | 0.064 | 0.074 | 0.010 | 0.050 |
(1.60) | (1.60) | (1.08) | (4.95) | (2.15) | |
B | 0.100 | 0.048 | 0.055 | 0.008 | 0.049 |
(2.92) | (1.85) | (3.04) | (3.51) | (1.74) | |
C | 0.140 | 0.058 | 0.068 | 0.009 | 0.052 |
(4.62) | (1.11) | (1.48) | (3.25) | (3.62) | |
D | 0.140 | 0.059 | 0.070 | 0.010 | 0.057 |
(1.32) | (0.75) | (0.64) | (0.92) | (0.38) | |
E | 0.160 | 0.077 | 0.080 | 0.010 | 0.055 |
(1.13) | (3.32) | (4.42) | (4.95) | (5.13) | |
F | 0.210 | 0.096 | 0.120 | 0.021 | 0.056 |
(0.98) | (1.12) | (1.26) | (0.96) | (0.80) | |
G | 0.170 | 0.089 | 0.110 | 0.017 | 0.068 |
(1.10) | (3.06) | (2.95) | (6.43) | (2.26) |
|
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||