Chinese Journal of Chromatography ›› 2020, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (1): 86-94.DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1123.2019.06016
Previous Articles Next Articles
HE Jincan(), ZHANG Shiyun, SU Yuyuan, SONG Jiayi, WU Fuhai
Received:
2019-06-19
Online:
2020-01-08
Published:
2020-12-11
Contact:
HE Jincan
Supported by:
HE Jincan, ZHANG Shiyun, SU Yuyuan, SONG Jiayi, WU Fuhai. Progress on the sample techniques and analytical methods for typical perfluorinated organic acids[J]. Chinese Journal of Chromatography, 2020, 38(1): 86-94.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.chrom-china.com/EN/10.3724/SP.J.1123.2019.06016
Analytical methods | Sample preparation | LOD/ (ng/L) | Analytes | Advantages | Disadvantages |
RRS: resonance Rayleigh scattering; ELISA: enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; VALLME: vortex-assisted liquid-liquid microextraction; μ SPE: micro-solid-phase extraction; SPME: solid-phase microextraction; PFCs: perfluorochemicals. | |||||
GC-MS | magnetic SPE, derivation[ | 86 | PFOA and other PFCs in lake water | chromatographic peak with high resolution | derivation reaction using toxic reagent, complex operation and time-consuming |
HPLC-MS | VALLME[ | 0.22, 3.0 | PFOS, PFOA, and other PFCs in seawater | without derivation, sensitive | incomplete analysis, consumption of large amounts of organic reagents, possible background pollution by fluorochemicals |
HPLC-MS/MS | μSPE[ | 0.06 | PFOA and other PFCs in river and rain water | short extraction time, sensitive, mature and | possible background pollution by fluorochemicals, incomplete analysis |
magnetic SPE[ | 0.05, 0.05 | PFOS, PFOA, and other PFCs in river water | reliable | ||
online SPE[ | 0.5, 1 | PFOS, PFOA, and other PFCs in surface and underground water | automatic, rapid, accurate, sensitive | maintenance operations by professional personnel | |
MS | SPME[ | 0.06, 0.1[ 20, 30[ | PFOS, PFOA, and other PFCs in lake water, river water, whole blood, milk[ | without chromatogra- phic separation, rapid, sensitive | less choice for commercial SPME, high cost of use and maintenance of the instrument |
SPE[ | 640 | PFOS and other PFCs river water and tap water | without chromatogra- phic separation, rapid, direct analysis | less sensitive without preconcentration, high cost for use and maintenance of the instrument | |
Colorimetry | SPE[ | 1000, 1000 | PFOS and PFOA in tap water and river water | low cost, rapid, easy operation, | less sensitive than chromatography or MS |
Fluore-scence | cation exchange resin[ | 1100 | PFOS in tap water and river water | low cost, rapid | less sensitive than chromatography or MS, analysis of one analyte at a time |
dilution[ | 0.066, 0.085 | PFOS in human urine and serum | rapid, selective, sensitive | analysis of one analyte at a time | |
RRS | cation exchange resin[ | 4500 | PFOA in tap water and river water | low cost, rapid, selective | less sensitive than chromatography or MS, analysis of one analyte at a time |
ELISA | 2.5[ | PFOS in river water, lake water, water in waterworks, and bottled purified water | rapid, convenient, high-throughput | less sensitive than chromatography or MS | |
Electrochemistry | SPE[ | 10 | PFOA in tap water, river water, and lake water | low cost, sensitive | complex modification of electrode, analysis of one analyte at a time |
Table 1 Comparison of different analytical methods for determination of PFOS and PFOA
Analytical methods | Sample preparation | LOD/ (ng/L) | Analytes | Advantages | Disadvantages |
RRS: resonance Rayleigh scattering; ELISA: enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; VALLME: vortex-assisted liquid-liquid microextraction; μ SPE: micro-solid-phase extraction; SPME: solid-phase microextraction; PFCs: perfluorochemicals. | |||||
GC-MS | magnetic SPE, derivation[ | 86 | PFOA and other PFCs in lake water | chromatographic peak with high resolution | derivation reaction using toxic reagent, complex operation and time-consuming |
HPLC-MS | VALLME[ | 0.22, 3.0 | PFOS, PFOA, and other PFCs in seawater | without derivation, sensitive | incomplete analysis, consumption of large amounts of organic reagents, possible background pollution by fluorochemicals |
HPLC-MS/MS | μSPE[ | 0.06 | PFOA and other PFCs in river and rain water | short extraction time, sensitive, mature and | possible background pollution by fluorochemicals, incomplete analysis |
magnetic SPE[ | 0.05, 0.05 | PFOS, PFOA, and other PFCs in river water | reliable | ||
online SPE[ | 0.5, 1 | PFOS, PFOA, and other PFCs in surface and underground water | automatic, rapid, accurate, sensitive | maintenance operations by professional personnel | |
MS | SPME[ | 0.06, 0.1[ 20, 30[ | PFOS, PFOA, and other PFCs in lake water, river water, whole blood, milk[ | without chromatogra- phic separation, rapid, sensitive | less choice for commercial SPME, high cost of use and maintenance of the instrument |
SPE[ | 640 | PFOS and other PFCs river water and tap water | without chromatogra- phic separation, rapid, direct analysis | less sensitive without preconcentration, high cost for use and maintenance of the instrument | |
Colorimetry | SPE[ | 1000, 1000 | PFOS and PFOA in tap water and river water | low cost, rapid, easy operation, | less sensitive than chromatography or MS |
Fluore-scence | cation exchange resin[ | 1100 | PFOS in tap water and river water | low cost, rapid | less sensitive than chromatography or MS, analysis of one analyte at a time |
dilution[ | 0.066, 0.085 | PFOS in human urine and serum | rapid, selective, sensitive | analysis of one analyte at a time | |
RRS | cation exchange resin[ | 4500 | PFOA in tap water and river water | low cost, rapid, selective | less sensitive than chromatography or MS, analysis of one analyte at a time |
ELISA | 2.5[ | PFOS in river water, lake water, water in waterworks, and bottled purified water | rapid, convenient, high-throughput | less sensitive than chromatography or MS | |
Electrochemistry | SPE[ | 10 | PFOA in tap water, river water, and lake water | low cost, sensitive | complex modification of electrode, analysis of one analyte at a time |
|
[1] | ZHOU Ranfeng, ZHANG Huixian, YIN Xiaoli, PENG Xitian. Progress in the application of novel nano-materials to the safety analysis of agricultural products [J]. Chinese Journal of Chromatography, 2023, 41(9): 731-741. |
[2] | LIU Wei, JIA Dongxue, LIAN Wenhui, ZHAO Yu. Recent advances in the applications of metal-organic frameworks-based molecularly imprinted materials [J]. Chinese Journal of Chromatography, 2023, 41(8): 651-661. |
[3] | WEN Yalun, SHAO Yuchen, ZHAO Xinying, QU Feng. Annual review of capillary electrophoresis technology in 2022 [J]. Chinese Journal of Chromatography, 2023, 41(5): 377-385. |
[4] | XIE Weiya, ZHU Xiaohan, MEI Hongcheng, GUO Hongling, LI Yajun, HUANG Yang, QIN Hao, ZHU Jun, HU Can. Applications of functional materials-based solid phase microextraction technique in forensic science [J]. Chinese Journal of Chromatography, 2023, 41(4): 302-311. |
[5] | OUYANG Yilan, YI Lin, QIU Luyun, ZHANG Zhenqing. Advances in heparin structural analysis by chromatography technologies [J]. Chinese Journal of Chromatography, 2023, 41(2): 107-121. |
[6] | ZHAI Hongwen, MA Hongyu, CAO Meirong, ZHANG Mingxing, MA Junmei, ZHANG Yan, LI Qiang. Application progress of on-line sample preparation techniques coupled with liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry system in the detection of food hazards [J]. Chinese Journal of Chromatography, 2023, 41(12): 1062-1072. |
[7] | YU Tao, CHEN Li, ZHANG Wenmin, ZHANG Lan, LU Qiaomei. Advances in synthesis methods and applications of microporous organic networks for sample preparation [J]. Chinese Journal of Chromatography, 2023, 41(12): 1052-1061. |
[8] | YAN Meiting, LONG Wenwen, TAO Xueping, WANG Dan, XIA Zhining, FU Qifeng. Research progress on the construction and applications of metal-organic frameworks in chromatographic stationary phases [J]. Chinese Journal of Chromatography, 2023, 41(10): 879-890. |
[9] | SONG Chunying, JIN Gaowa, YU Dongping, XIA Donghai, FENG Jing, GUO Zhimou, LIANG Xinmiao. Development progress of stationary phase for supercritical fluid chromatography and related application in natural products [J]. Chinese Journal of Chromatography, 2023, 41(10): 866-878. |
[10] | JIANG Wenqian, CHEN Yumei, BI Wentao. Synthesis of porous organic framework materials based on deep eutectic solvents and their application in solid-phase extraction [J]. Chinese Journal of Chromatography, 2023, 41(10): 901-910. |
[11] | YANG Han, TANG Wenqi, ZENG Chu, MENG Shasha, XU Ming. Rational design of high performance metal organic framework stationary phase for gas chromatography [J]. Chinese Journal of Chromatography, 2023, 41(10): 853-865. |
[12] | WANG Guoxiu, CHEN Yonglei, LÜ Wenjuan, CHEN Hongli, CHEN Xingguo. Recent developments in the application of covalent organic frameworks in capillary electrochromatography [J]. Chinese Journal of Chromatography, 2023, 41(10): 835-842. |
[13] | ZOU Xiaowei, LIU Xing, ZHANG Jianming. Advances in thin layer chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry technology [J]. Chinese Journal of Chromatography, 2023, 41(1): 24-36. |
[14] | MAYIRA Abulitifu, ZHONG Zihao, BAI Xi. Progress in the application of preparative gas chromatography in separating volatile compounds [J]. Chinese Journal of Chromatography, 2023, 41(1): 37-46. |
[15] | ZHAI Rongrong, GAO Wen, LI Mengning, YANG Hua. Applications of ion mobility-mass spectrometry in the chemical analysis in traditional Chinese medicines [J]. Chinese Journal of Chromatography, 2022, 40(9): 782-787. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||